Grad School Notes


In the running for Best Picture: True Grit (Joel & Ethan Coen).

When I was a little girl, few evenings held more magic than that of the Academy Awards. I would surround myself with the comfiest pillows and blankets. Popcorn and hot chocolate sat within easy reach. By the time the award for Best Picture rolled around, I was usually drowsy—and the film was one I had not seen. Most of the nominations were films I had not seen. Yet it was the ‘aura’ of the Oscars that captured my imagination. All the fancy movie stars dressed in beautiful—and sometimes hideous—evening wear. (I still remember the time when Bjork dressed in that swan get-up.) The glamour. The red carpet. The sunny California evenings. The celebration of movies.

As an eleven-year old, I dreamed of the roles I would play in movies. I dreamed of the day I would receive an Academy Award. I even scribbled a few possible lines for my acceptance speech.

With age I have developed a healthy dose of scepticism and realism. The Oscars are decided by a bunch of men and women who comprise The Academy—over 6,000 of them. Sure there are some genuine film artists, critics and makers in that colossus, but it is no illusion that personal preference plays into the ultimate decisions. Once you know the migraine-inducing, absurdly complicated nomination process, the disillusionment cuts even deeper. No wonder deserving films/directors/actors are snubbed each year.

The award ceremony itself can be a gamble with certain years ending up as a monumental waste of time. The Academy Awards is—at its best—a show. It should entertain (like the glorious Hugh Jackman years), and it should educate and remind us of all the advancements, breakthroughs, and stellar performances from the past year in film. Such coupling is rare. More often than not, hosts try too hard—sadly making fools of themselves—and several acceptance speeches make a visit to the dentist sound like a spa retreat.

Despite all this, I love the Academy Awards. Why? Because I love film. I love going to the movies. I love discussing them afterward, whether that means shredding it to pieces or praising its art direction. I love film even more now that I am studying its complexities in grad school. The Oscars are to cinephiles as March Madness is to basketball fans. It’s the Super Bowl of film. (And we’re done with the sports metaphors.)

Most of the Oscar hype goes to the Big Four: Best Picture, Best Director, Best Actor and Best Actress. These were the categories that used to most interest me as well, but for the past several years I pay far more attention to cinematography, costume design, sound editing, sound mixing, makeup, film editing, and visual effects. To me, these are the lifeblood of film—and thus the most fascinating. I wish more people paid attention to the guts of movies, rather than the glittery ‘stars’ upon the screen. Post-production filmmakers do not receive just recognition. (Are the Sci-Tech Awards even televised?)

Colin Firth, Natalie Portman, David Fincher. The King’s Speech, The Social Network, The Fighter, True Grit. These are the names that surface in articles written about the 2011 Academy Awards. I wish I could say more about the nominations, but truth be told I have had neither the budget nor time to watch every single nominee. I do have the somewhat perverse hope of a major upset this year. The Awards can get so predictable, that a wicked curve ball would be a delightful treat. Fingers crossed.

Oh, and my girlish dreams of accepting an Academy Award for acting? Long gone. The award for ‘Achievement in directing’? Give me ten years.

Do you have Oscar fever? Which films do you want to see recognized?

Time has done what she does best: fly. Tomorrow begins my second term at the University of York, and here I sit, taking a long drag of oxygen as I prepare to dive into another nine weeks of research, modules, essays, research, meetings and – yes – more research. To add to the usual stresses, I get to figure out my dissertation topic this term and begin the research process. The problem there? I have four topics already and no idea which to choose.

Pause while I break out my breathing exercises.

It is not all bad – in fact, I thrive off strenuous academic work. But I do need balance. After running myself into the ground last term (hello, bronchitis), I have committed myself to a more holistic approach for spring. More walks, more exploring, more fiction, more yoga.

More blogging.

If all goes to plan, I will blog on Sundays (either weekly or bi-weekly). And to recap the past few months, in which (edge)wise was a veritable wasteland, here are a few highlights from the end of last term:

  • Survived my first major snowfall in England.
  • Experienced my first ‘Christmas Faire’ in a bona fide castle in December. It looked more like an overgrown mansion, but the shopping was enjoyable regardless.
  • Attended a performance of Handel’s Messiah in the York Minster. There are simply no words to describe how breathtakingly beautiful this was. It was a spiritual experience, on par with Arthur’s Seat.
  • Celebrated my 25th birthday in York: museums, Indian food, beer, and books. Fabulous day.
  • Visited Durham en route to Newcastle Airport. The ‘Christmas feeling’ finally set in as I relaxed with Tessa and her family, watching movies until midnight and experiencing Beamish Museum.
  • Spent a delectable two weeks at home for Christmas. Powells, sister dates, home-cooked meals, my dad’s famous pumpkin pie, Christmas stockings, family, Tatum, book club, Lewisville Park, Ram’s Head, friends at New Years, and Harry Potter. Not to mention time with my sweetheart. I actually had the opportunity to relax. I already miss, well, all those things.
  • Returned to York and spent the next three days finalizing my essays. For those who are interested, I focused on: 1) the narrative structure of Lost (specifically its beginning), analyzing the first four episodes in an exploration of how the writers ‘set up’ the show’s complex narrative in order to hook viewers and create ‘quality television’; 2) the current debate surrounding the methodology of ‘third-generation audience research’; and 3) feminism and negotiated space within Mad Men, highlighting the relationship between screen and industry and suggesting that as long as women hold a minimized role in the television industry, the stories and images seen on television will not depict a realistic portrait of today’s American woman.

And now it begins again. I’ll keep you informed.

Breathe in, breathe out.

xx

Tessa and I at the Minster for the performance of Handel's Messiah.

Monster icicle outside my bedroom window in York.

Christmas stockings on Christmas morning.

Reunited with Tatum. Bliss. (And yes, her eyes are fluorescent.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.